REASONABLE TIME FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: LEGISLATIVE ESTABLISHMENT OR JUDICIAL DISCRETION?

In an attempt to resolve the proposed legal sophism famous scientists, practitioners and students of educational organizations who are just embarking on the path of legal knowledge have come together. They all ask themselves the same questions: can a legal term be reasonable or is it something else, can a court go beyond limited time periods or is it always bound by them? Since the law provides both possibilities, the task seems unsolvable. In fact, there is no problem, since the deadline set by law is already reasonable in itself, because the rationality of parliamentarians is not questioned, and its sole change is not acceptable, otherwise the judge replaces the legislative branch. The time standards for resolving cases are subject to strict timekeeping and can be calculated according to mathematical formulas, and compensation for government assistance (presence in court) is a form of remuneration that already has a monetary equivalent and should be awarded to interested or (and) participating persons, no matter how they are professional participants in the proceedings.